Skip to main content
Instapage

What If Rs 21 Lakh Crore Black Money Was Not Siphoned Off By Corrupt Indians Between 2002-11?

Between 2002-2011, corrupt Indians siphoned off a total of Rs 21,00,000 crore ($343 billion) worth of black money into offshore bank accounts. Rank wise, we are world’s 5th most corrupt country in terms of black money outflow. These stunning revelations were included in a report titled “Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2002-2011” which was released by Global Financial Integrity, Washington-based research and advocacy organization which is supported by Ford Foundation.


For the year 2011, we were proudly placed at #3 in terms of total black money outflow. During that year, our corrupt elite sent across Rs 5,04,000 crore abroad as black money. Due to meteoric rise of Mexico and China, our position, fortunately, slipped to #5 for the overall decade.


Illicit Financial Flows from the Top Ten Developing Economies, 2002-2011


Black Money OutFlows | What If Rs 21 Lakh Crore Black Money Was Not Siphoned Off By Corrupt Indians Between 2002 11?


Global Financial Integrity (GSI) president Raymond Baker said while releasing this report, “As the world economy sputters along in the wake of the global financial crisis, the illicit underworld is thriving—siphoning more and more money from developing countries each year,”


Overall, the developing countries of the world during this period of 2002-2011 lost around $1.9 trillion worth of money into the unknown abyss filled with corruption, black money, crime and greed.


GSI tracked 15 developing countries for this research, out of which 6 are in Asia: China, Malaysia, India, Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines; 2 in Africa: Nigeria and South Africa; 4 in Europe: Russia, Belarus, Poland and Serbia; 2 in South America: Brazil and Mexico and one in Arab region: Iraq. Overall, During the period of 2002-2011, China led the pack with outflow of $1.08 trillion as black money, followed by Russia at $880 billion, Mexico at $461 billion, Malaysia at $370 billion. This outflow of black money all over the world is increasing at an alarming rate of 10.2% every year.


You can find the country wise ranking here and year-on-year data on Black money export here.


Just imagine for a second that this Rs 21 lakh crore was not siphoned off from India, and it stayed with us; then what we could have achieved?


Flyovers:


A standard flyover of 10 kms may cost anywhere between Rs 50 crore to 100 crore anywhere in India. With Rs 21 Lakh Crore, we could have built 21,000 such flyovers.


Metro Rail:


Delhi Metro was built at an approximate cost of Rs 10,000 crore. With all these black money, we could have built 210 metro rails all across India. All Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities could have been covered.


Highways:


Golden Quadrilateral Highway Project, the most ambitious road project by government of India which covers 5600 Kms (connecting all 4 metros) is costing around Rs 36000 crore. With Rs 21 Lakh crore, we could have built 58 such projects or covering 3,26,666 kms of highway!


Fighter Jet:


A single F-35 fighter jet costs Rs 1200 Crore. With all this black money, we could have bought 1750 such fighter jets.


Steel Factory:


Corus Steel factory in UK was bought by TATA Steel for Rs 45,000 crore; it was 4 times larger than TATA Steel and has 45,000 employees. 46 such steel factories all over India can be built with Rs 21,00,000 crore.


College:


A state of the art Engineering College can be built for Rs 100 crore; 21,000 engineering colleges could have been constructed by using this black money.


Buildings:


Burj Khaleefa, world’s tallest man-made structure was built using Rs 9000 crore; 233 such Burj Khaleefa’s could have been built using Rs 21,00,000 crore.


Sometimes, my mind goes numb just by imagining the loss incurred by Indians due to corruption and crime.


Who will resolve this?






from Trakin' the india business buzz

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Get SMS Alerts for Gmail via Twitter

How do you get SMS notifications on your mobile phone for important emails in your Gmail? Google doesn’t support text notifications for their email service but Twitter does. If we can figure out a way to connect our Twitter and Gmail accounts, the Gmail notifications can arrive as text on our mobile via Twitter. Let me explain:Twitter allows you to follow any @user via a simple SMS. They provide short codes for all countries (see list) and if you text FOLLOW to this shortcode following by the  username, any tweets from that user will arrive in your phone as text notifications. For instance, if you are in the US, you can tweet FOLLOW labnol to 40404 to get my tweets as text messages. Similarly, users in India can text FOLLOW labnol to 9248948837 to get the tweets via SMS.The short code service of Twitter can act as a Gmail SMS notifier. You create a new Twitter account, set the privacy to private and this account will send a tweet when you get a new email in Gmail. Follow this account …

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…