Skip to main content
Instapage

Best Selling Indian Cars Taken for Crash Tests And Look Who Passed [Videos]

NO ONE. Every SINGLE one of them failed. Even surprisingly each scored a ZERO on a scale of 5. The tests was conducted by London based car-safety watchdog Global NCAP.


The cars that was selected for the safety test were hatchbacks; Tata Nano, Maruti Suzuki Alto 800, Hyundai i10, Ford Figo and Volkswagen Polo.


The car models chosen for the test had to be the entry level models that are manufactured in India only. Hence none of them had airbags, which is considered one of the most basic requirement by global standards.


Two tests were conducted independently on on the same make and model for every brand. One test was made at 56 KMPH and the other one was at 64 KMPH.


All the cars were obtained from the Indian showrooms and shipped to Germany where the crash test was performed.


The results were shockingly bad. Each scored a zero on a scale of 5.


Safer Cars in India | Best Selling Indian Cars Taken for Crash Tests And Look Who Passed [Videos]


Representatives from each brand were on site to witness the test. As the results were on table, the manufacturers could only come up with excuses stating the complexity in designing the safety of a car. And that it also involves the risk of the person outside the car, so the person at wheel needs to well versed with the traffic rules and the roads should be in the good condition. While the last part, though sounds like a reasonable argument, it bears no connection with the manufacturing process or the design aspect even for a nitwit.


Indian Cars Crash Test Videos


Tata Nano


In the 64km/h NCAP test, the Tata Nano achieved zero stars rating for its adult occupant protection. The vehicle structure was rated as unstable, increasing the risk of life-threatening injuries and making the car unsuitable for the fitment of airbags. The car achieved a zero-star rating for its child protection as it was not possible to install child seats in the car.


The Nano was not able to meet the UN’s minimum safety requirements in the 56km/h crash test.



Maruti Suzuki Alto 800


Like Nano, Alto 800 achieve zero stars in adult occupant protection and vehicle structures was rated as unstable. However, using the child seats recommended by Suzuki-Maruti, the Alto 800 achieved a two-star rating for child protection.


The Alto 800 was not able to meet the UN’s minimum safety requirements in the 56km/h crash test.



Ford Figo


Ford Figo also got zero star rating in the tests however the vehicle structure was rated as stable. Without safety equipment such as airbags, too much of the crash energy was absorbed directly by the occupants. Using the child seats recommended by Ford, the car achieved a two-star rating for its child protection.


The silver lining for Figo was that it was able to meet the UN’s minimum safety requirements in the 56km/h crash test as the driver’s head narrowly avoided direct contact with the steering wheel.



Hyundai i10


Like previous cars, Hyundai i10 also got zero stars in adult occupant protection and vehicle structure was also rated as unstable.


Using the child seats recommended by Hyundai, the i10 achieved a one-star rating for child protection.


The i10 was not able to meet the UN’s minimum safety requirements in the 56km/h crash test.



Volkswagen Polo (without airbags)


In the crash test, the Volkswagen Polo without airbags achieved a zero-star rating for its adult occupant protection. The vehicle structure was stable, but without safety equipment such as airbags, dummy readings indicated a high risk of life-threatening injuries.



All the companies reacted with a resolve to refurbish their brand. To back their point most came up with the fact that they meet the Indian standards, which again shows how medieval our policies are to this day. Although one (Volkswagen), considering this as an embarrassing lesson, have decided to come up with basic prerequisites like dual front airbags for their future models.


The growth of Indian middle class has contributed to the booming automobile industry but what seems from these results are that the cars we ride were never meant to keep us SAFE as per global safety benchmarks.


Another finding by NDTV also points out that the Euro i10 (made for European markets) have good ratings by the same agency, while the ones Indians drive scored a zero on safety. This raises the question of discrimination, which is also equally if not more disturbing. It intrigues me, if our policy makers will now reconsider or just let the dirty business march on?






from Trakin' the india business buzz

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How to Get SMS Alerts for Gmail via Twitter

How do you get SMS notifications on your mobile phone for important emails in your Gmail? Google doesn’t support text notifications for their email service but Twitter does. If we can figure out a way to connect our Twitter and Gmail accounts, the Gmail notifications can arrive as text on our mobile via Twitter. Let me explain:Twitter allows you to follow any @user via a simple SMS. They provide short codes for all countries (see list) and if you text FOLLOW to this shortcode following by the  username, any tweets from that user will arrive in your phone as text notifications. For instance, if you are in the US, you can tweet FOLLOW labnol to 40404 to get my tweets as text messages. Similarly, users in India can text FOLLOW labnol to 9248948837 to get the tweets via SMS.The short code service of Twitter can act as a Gmail SMS notifier. You create a new Twitter account, set the privacy to private and this account will send a tweet when you get a new email in Gmail. Follow this account …

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…