Skip to main content

LG G4 Confirms the Premium-Mainstream Split in Android Flagships

When LG unveiled its G4 flagship day before, it rounded off the flagship fleet for the current Android generation, the most notable of which are the Samsung S6 Edge, the HTC One M9, the Sony Xperia Z4, the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro, the Honor 6 Plus, the Nexus 6, the Moto Turbo, the Lenovo Vibe Z2 Pro, the Asus ZenFone 2, and the OnePlus One.


Cast a look at that list, factor in the fact that most pundits expect the LG G4 to cost in the vicinity of (and some even say well in excess of) USD 650, and a divide becomes visible. On the one hand, you have devices that offer a premium experience at a premium price (generally well above USD 600 and some even close to four figures) in which you have the likes of the One M9, the Xperia Z4, the S6 Edge, the Nexus 6 (oh, the irony!), the Moto Turbo and the G4, and on the other you have devices that claim to offer a similar experience but at prices that are lower, and in some cases, embarrassingly lower than what the premium priced flagships cost – for instance, the OnePlus One comes with a price tag of under USD 350 in India, and the Xiaomi Mi Note Pro costs around USD 371. Even the relatively ‘expensive’ device in that group, the Vibe Z2 Pro comes for about USD 475 in India.

Counter balance that with the fact that the most affordable device of the ‘premium’ segment, the Moto Turbo (Moto Maxx globally), sells for about USD 660 in India, and it becomes apparent that there is a new split in the Android flagship segment.

On the one hand, you have the premium pricing players, and on the other is a breed of manufacturers looking to deliver great specs at a relatively lower price. Hey, the world’s first smartphone with 4GB RAM, the Asus ZenFone 2’s most expensive avatar comes for as little as USD 363 in India, and the Honor 6 Plus throws in dual 8.0-megapixel cameras for about USD 419.


The differences extend beyond pricing – the lower priced players seem to rely heavily on selling exclusively online and on social networking campaigns while the premium players stick to conventional channels of sales as well as media (ad campaigns in print and electronic media still rule for them). And while the higher priced brands tend to train their guns on the iPhone, the lower priced ones are not averse to taking a poke at their higher priced brethren.

Now, we know that there are those who will say that there were always high-priced flagships and relatively lower priced ones, but what we would like to point out is that in the past, the ‘lower priced flagships‘ came from local brands which fought mainly on price and generally compromised on specs, performance and even design. Now, anyone who has seen a OnePlus One, a Honor 6 Plus, ZenFone 2, a Mi Note Pro or a Vibe Z2 Pro will tell you that they pull no punches in the design, hardware or performance departments.
A year ago, people looking for a high-end Android device were torn between the HTC One series, the Samsung Galaxy S series, the Sony Xperia Z series and the LG G series. Today, people still think of this awesome foursome, but – and this is quite a massive ‘but’ – they are also considering the offerings from what we call the ‘high spec – low price‘ price players. There are those who insist that a person wanting a premium device will not even think of investing in a much lower priced device, but if we had a penny for every time someone has asked us whether they should go for a OnePlus One or HTC One M8 (the One M9 had not been released at the time), we would have made a pretty penny. No, we are not saying that the “high spec – low price” players will clean out the premium priced ones, as some pundits are saying – but judging from the success enjoyed by the likes of Xiaomi, OnePlus and Lenovo, they are certainly not doing badly at all. They might not have the sort of ‘brand equity’ built over time that the likes of Samsung, HTC, Sony or LG have, but what they do possess are killer prices with a very decent hardware-design blend.

The premium segment might prefer to stick to its higher-price tags, but what cannot be denied is that there is a new kind of flagship docking in the Android harbor. It does not look bad at all, it has a pretty powerful crew in terms of hardware and software, and those wanting a cruise on it need not shell out a premium price. It will not sink the exclusive premier high-end fleet yet, but it will give consumer an alternative to shelling out a bomb for high quality.

Yeah, Android just got a bit more fragmented. And this time, it is not on OS versions, but on flagship prices.

And this is one fragmentation we are not complaining about. Not one bit.

© Raju PP for Technology Personalized, 2015. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact us, so we can take legal action immediately. If you are on Twitter you can follow me @rajupp! | Permalink |

The post LG G4 Confirms the Premium-Mainstream Split in Android Flagships appeared first on Technology Personalized.


Related Stories

from Technology Personalized


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

Software Review Site TrustRadius Has A New Way to Treat Reviews Obtained Through Vendors

Online user reviews are the most powerful marketing technique for influencing purchase decisions. But do they accurately represent the views of most users?Today, business software review platform TrustRadius is announcing a new way — called trScore — to handle the bias introduced in reviews by users obtained through the vendor of the reviewed software product. The site says more than two million software buyers visit each year to check out its product reviews.To understand trScore, let’s first look at TrustRadius’ approach.The site says it authenticates all users through their LinkedIn profiles. It also requires users to answer eight to ten questions about the product, in order to weed out users having no familiarity. Additionally, a staff person reads every review before it is posted, and the site says about three percent of reviews are rejected for not meeting guidelines.As for the reviews themselves, TrustRadius puts them into two main buckets: independently-sourced reviews and ven…