Skip to main content

The 25% Rule For Reporting And Why It Matters


Detailed and consistent reporting is vital to any online marketing effort because it tells the story of the work being done. Both the agency and the client need to document these initiatives to ensure that (ideally) progress is being made.

Unfortunately, an all-too-common problem is that too much reporting is occurring, hindering management and growth efforts.

In this post, I will discuss ways to minimize time spent on reporting while making it just as effective, but first I’m going to define how much reporting is too much. While I will give examples from the PPC space, where I work, many of the principles I’ll outline apply no matter what your marketing discipline.

Generally, reporting (including written analysis) should take no more than 25 percent of your monthly billable hours. For example, if you bill 40 hours, then at the most, you should be doing 10 hours’ worth of reporting. In other words, for every three hours of management, you are conducting one hour of reporting.

I’ve found that this threshold is enough to pull and analyze data while still leaving ample time to make account optimizations. Spending more time equates to busywork that often isn’t necessary.

I do want to be clear that I’m not discounting the importance of reporting. No client/vendor relationship can succeed without consistent reporting.

However, in the context of overall account management, it must be limited. Going beyond the 25 percent threshold doesn’t allow for necessary management time, especially with accounts that have capped billable hours.

If reporting is that necessary to a client, the project scope needs to be re-examined, or the agency’s role needs to be reassessed. (Perhaps the agency runs reports and manages only what is in the account instead of being responsible for growth.)

Let’s examine three techniques for better reporting efficiency.

Determine What’s Necessary

It amazes me the depth that some reports go into. For example, a report may showcase the top 20 of each of these PPC attributes:

  • Campaigns
  • Ad groups
  • Keywords
  • Ads

In addition, the data may be presented in a few different ways. One section may look at the top attributes by conversion and another by clicks.

All of this data alone could take up three pages of a report! Granted, there may be data pulling automation involved (more to come shortly), but that’s still a fair amount of data.

Too many reports means less time for account management and growth.

Too many reports means less time for account management and growth.

I’m not saying that every piece of data isn’t important to review, but think about your target audience. Is the data you are presenting too granular? Can you bundle the data up in a more holistic way that conveys the same information?

As an example, instead of creating four different tables of account attributes, consider creating one table of the top 30 keywords that also includes their respective campaigns and ad groups.

Furthermore, I will remove sections of the report if the client and I aren’t discussing them or if it’s clear they are being ignored. In this case, I act first and ask for forgiveness later.

If the client requests that the section be added back in, I will oblige, but nine times out of ten, it’s never mentioned again.

Finally, not all reports need to be equal. Everything you include in the monthly report doesn’t need to run in the weekly report. Perhaps the monthly report contains the top 20 of each PPC attribute, while the weekly does not.

Again, think about your target audience. You are summing up the highlights and areas needing improvement for your client.

There’s no specific minimum or maximum amount of information you need to report, but you don’t want your client (and yourself) getting lost in the data.

Automate What You Can

You can’t automate all of your reporting. As great as that would be, it isn’t in the cards, as all reports require at least some manual input.

It can also get cluttered. For example, you may run a custom report in Google Analytics and have it emailed to the client each week.

You may also manually create and send a report each week. Many report sources and formats can create confusion.

But even if you can automate one or two of the reporting sections you run today, it would be beneficial. Look into whatever platform you are using, and see what can be done.

You may find a section of the report that can mostly be automated, but one facet needs to be run manually. In this case (and if the section isn’t crucial to the client), I would take the same “act first and ask for forgiveness later” tactic.

Have An Honest Conversation With Your Client

If you are finding that even with the removal of sections and more automation, reporting is still taking up greater than 25 percent of your time, it may be worthwhile to speak with your client. I find it’s best to be honest about the problem. (Don’t sugarcoat it.)

I’ve told clients that reporting is taking up too much time, which is taking away from our ability to manage and grow accounts. I’ll ask the clients questions such as:

  • Which sections of the report can be removed without affecting what we need to report?
  • Can certain sections be reported less frequently (e.g., monthly or biweekly)?
  • Can we have Google Analytics (or whatever platform) email you certain reports?

In many cases, clients aren’t aware that reporting is taking too much time. Especially if you make note of the management time being lost, clients tend to be fine with less or adjusted reporting.

In the case where the client needs a time-consuming manual report, try to meet halfway.

For example, for one client, I once ran a weekly AdWords report that I had to download and format. Due to the intricacy of the data, the formatting took at least 20 minutes every time. That was at least an hour and 20 minutes of report formatting each month.

I explained the dilemma to the client and asked if I could download the raw data report instead, and he could format it. He understood the situation and agreed to the proposed solution.

Final Thoughts

Reporting is unique for every client, and that won’t change. Thus, we need to devise solutions for more efficient reporting that allow for ample account management and growth.

The 25 percent time threshold is an attempt to focus reporting efforts on what matters most to each client. If you are spending too much time on reporting, it may be worth it to explore updates and have an honest conversation with your client.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…