Skip to main content

Report: Yahoo Board Meets To Discuss Potential Sale Of Company


This morning a couple of articles appeared speculating about who could potentially Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer. The hypothetical candidates included Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg, Google/YouTube’s Susan Wojcicki and former interim Yahoo CEO Ross Levinsohn.

Then the Wall Street Journal this afternoon reported that the Yahoo board is going to consider this week whether to sell some or all of the company:

The fate of troubled Internet portal Yahoo Inc. may be decided in a marathon series of board meetings this week.

Yahoo’s board plans to weigh a potential sale of the company’s core business during a series of meetings beginning Wednesday and continuing through Friday, people familiar with the matter said.

The board is expected to discuss whether to proceed with a plan to spin off more than $30 billion in shares of Alibaba Holding Group Ltd., find a buyer for Yahoo’s core business of Web properties, or both, the people said.

In the wake of the $4+ billion acquisition of AOL by Verizon, some institutional investors are urging a hard look at a sale of the core business. Starboard Value LP in particular has been critical of Marissa Mayer’s progress in turning around Yahoo’s performance and had previously made the misguided suggestion of a merger between AOL and Yahoo.

While there may have been missteps, Mayer has probably done as good (or better) a job at bringing the company back from decrepitude as any chief executive could have given structural pressure the company faces from Google and Facebook. On the one side Google owns the search market and on the other Facebook has usurped Yahoo’s place as the preeminent display advertising platform/property.

Given her star status expectations have always been very high for Mayer and that may be part of the challenge she has faced. Mayer has made solid investments in mobile, video, native advertising and more recently bold investments paid search, undoing some of the damage and poor decisions of her predecessors, most notably Carol Bartz.

However, meaningful revenue growth has been elusive. Institutional investors are now feeling impatient. According to the WSJ article, “Private equity firms are expected to be among those taking a look at Yahoo’s core business, people familiar with the matter said.”

In total, Yahoo is a much more valuable property than AOL. The company is currently worth about $31 billion. That’s based in part on Yahoo’s remaining 15 percent interest in Alibaba and its minority stake in Yahoo Japan, worth nearly $9 billion.

Putting aside these assets, and about $6 billion in cash and cash equivalents, financial analysts have pegged the “core business” at roughly $4 billion (like AOL). Yet it remains one of the largest properties online (200+ million visitors) and one of the few true brands on the internet. It only ranks behind its two biggest competitors Google and Facebook.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…