Skip to main content

25 useful metrics for content marketing success

Content marketing has been widely adopted but how are people measuring whether it works or not? Which metrics should we be looking at?

The answer to that last question will depend on the business and its goals. Measuring for its own sake is pointless, it has to align with business goals.

With this in mind, I’m not going to tell you which metrics are most important, but will simply present the various metrics you could use.

The basic (obvious) content metrics

These are perhaps the most obvious and often easiest things to look at, and can be found with Google Analytics (other analytics platforms are available of course).


Simple enough. How many views did your article, video, infographic etc attract?

It’s a good measure of popularity and indicates whether your content has hit the mark, especially in comparison with other pages.

If the aim is to build an audience and measure popularity, or to convince advertisers, it works.

However, if your goals are different, pageviews will only tell part of the story.

If you’re targeting a specific audience, the number of people viewing your content is less important than whether the right people are. 

content metrics pageviews

For example, I could write a piece of clickbait on Kanye or Trump (don’t worry, I won’t) and attract 100,000 views.

However, would it help Search Engine Watch? Would those visitors become regular readers or decide to attend our events? I doubt it.


This can be more precise than pageviews as views can be distorted by other factors. Dirty tricks like pagination for instance.

users sessions


This was previously known as visits in Google Analytics and refers to a single visit form a user, and may include them viewing several pages.

Bounce rates

I’ve covered bounce rates in more detail previously, but basically it tells you the percentage of people that left a given page on your website without viewing any other pages.

It’s a good general measure of whether your content is successful in sending traffic to other, perhaps more valuable areas of your site, if that is the purpose of the content.

What constitutes a good or bad bounce rates depends on the nature of the content and the business goals.

Average time on page

This is a metric I like to use, and it’s relevant for a publisher like SEW. We aim to produce useful content that people will find useful.

If we write a detailed article, and people take the time to read, that suggests it worked well and that the topic was interesting. This can them inform future decisions on content.

For example, this article on internal linking has and average time on page of 4 minutes and 6 seconds, which is higher than the site average.

It suggests that at least some people found it useful (I hope).

time on page

Visitors viewing multiple pages

Unless your content’s goals can be met with one pageview, then you’re likely to want your content to lead people to another page. Perhaps to sign up for a trial, make a purchase, or download a white paper.

There are a few ways to measure this, but I use a custom segment which filters out the visitors which view three or more pages.

So, for the article mentioned above, we can see how many viewed that and went on to view other pages on the site, and compare this with other pages.

page depth

New and returning users

If the aim on your content is to attract new visitors, then this is the metric for you.

new return

Traffic sources

Where is the traffic coming from for your content? Are you targeting social users, or perhaps search traffic?

Which sources deliver the ‘right’ visitors? Which work over time?

Engagement and social metrics

Some of these metrics can be found on Google Analytics, for others there are plenty of useful tools (free and paid) to use.

NB – the bounce rate, time on page and page depth metrics described above could easily fit into this section too.

Social shares

Now that Twitter has killed share counts, third party tools are the easiest way to find this data.

Here’s the most shared posts on SEW from the past six months, shown on Buzzsumo.

Not the same as the most popular posts though. It’s interesting (and useful) to note the differences.

social shares

Shares by content length / type

Which kinds of content hit the mark on social? Do longer posts work better?

shares by content

Who is sharing your content? Are you reaching influential users?

Look into the detail – are you reaching people who are likely to amplify the reach of your content?

Are you reaching people whose profiles match your target audience?

who shared

Number of comments

While a lot of opinion around articles is now expressed away from the site, the number of comments on a post can still give an indication of whether the content has hit the mark.

Quality of comments also matters. Are people having an intelligent discussion around the points raised by the article, or are they just insulting each other? Hopefully the former…


Are people clicking through from your content to the relevant pages? Sign up forms, lead generation forms etc.

Comments / references to your content

Is your content working from a PR perspective? Are other sites and sources picking up on your content and mentioning your brand?

Search metrics

SEO goals are part of content marketing, so it’s important to see what effect it is having.

Search traffic

You’ve launched a content-driven campaign, or perhaps a blog. Is it driving more search traffic over time?


Keyword goals

If you are using content to improve rankings for certain terms, measure how the content moves the rankings, and which pages are being returned for them.


Link building

Is your content attracting links? Which content attracts links from the best sources?


Is it evergreen?

Are you producing evergreen content that delivers traffic and leads over time?

This may require more effort and investment, but it can pay off more handsomely.

Brand metrics

These are harder to measure, but remain important.


Does the content help to promote your brand? Do people recall your brand? Do they have a favourable impression?


What are people saying about your content and brand? Social monitoring tools, surveys etc can provide some insight here.

Content perfomance

Does your content drive sales and leads? Does it move the bottom line? This is the ultimate aim of content marketing, whatever the goals.

Direct sales

Are people clicking through from your content and making a purchase?

For example, Repair Clinic produces content relevant to people’s repair issues which ranks well in Google and leads visitors to pages like the one shown below.

How many are actually making a purchase?



Are people signing up for test drives, calls for more information, visits to showrooms etc?

Increasing conversions

Did the content you added at a certain part of the sales funnel increase conversions?

It could be better product page copy, or even a piece of micro-content explaining form fields.

Email subscribers

Does your content help to build you email list? This may not deliver an immediate return, but it contributes to email marketing ROI.


How much did the content cost to produce? How many sales or leads can you attribute to it?

This is the ultimate measurement, though outcomes which can’t be easily quantified should be considered.

For example, if the content helped to build awareness of the brand or increased sign ups to emails, then this may deliver a return on the investment long-term.

Which metrics have I missed? What works for you? Let me know below and I’ll add them to the list…

via Search Engine Watch


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…