Skip to main content

Micromax Maintains Second Position in India, but Fast Losing Ground

Guest Post by Sanjeev Kumar.

Whenever one talks about the Indian smartphone market, especially the budget segment, the first brand that comes to the mind is Micromax. No matter wherever you go, you will spot every third person flaunting a Micromax smartphone. The Indian brand, which threatened the market leader Samsung in the year 2014, appeared to be losing its touch during the last year. While both Samsung and Micromax retained their first and second positions respectively, Micromax witnessed a huge dip in its sales volume by the end of 2015. There were several reasons behind the dip in performance of Micromax and the advent of premium Chinese brands was one of them. In this write-up we will take a look at the numbers posted by various brands and the reason behind Micromax’s dip and rise of other brands in India.

Recent positioning of brands in India

Recently, major brands posted the numbers achieved by them in the last quarter of the year 2015 and we are not surprised to see Samsung at the top of the chart, yet again. The South Korean handset maker owned 28.6% market share in the smartphone domain, which is a significant improvement over same period of last year (27.4% in 2014). In 2015, Micromax had the second largest chunk of the market share with 14.30% share. However, the number comes as a huge surprise to us as the brand posted a share of 19.50% in the corresponding period of last year. The real shocker, however, was the number posted by Lenovo (including Motorola) that jumped to 11.40% from 4.70 % in last quarter of 2014. Rest of the market share is occupied by remaining brands where Intex (9.6%) and Lava (6.8%) who showed a significant jump from the last year.


In 2015, it was the budget segment of smartphone that ruled the market in the country and Micromax was again the leader, however, it posted a decline in the market share vis-à-vis last year. Samsung and Lenovo, on the other hand, posted a significant figure that is in excess of double their figure in 2014.

How Smartphone manufacturers fared year on year against 2014?

Coming to year on year performance by an individual brand, Lenovo has managed to take everyone by surprise. After having acquired Motorola, Lenovo posted a growth of 142%, which is a massive growth for any smartphone manufacturer. The brand has been riding shotgun on the success of Moto and A series of smartphones from its stable. Samsung managed to grow by 4% from last quarter of 2014 to corresponding period of 2015. The South Korean brand has managed to gain lost grounds by launching new budget segment smartphones under its ON and J series. Samsung Galaxy J2 was the best selling smartphone from the brand and the new series is expected to evolve with time.

Surprisingly, the king of budget domain, Micromax is the only brand that reported a percentage decline in the smartphone segment. The Indian handset maker has posted a percentage decline of 27% over the duration of one year from last quarter of 2014.

Looking at the market shares, one cannot help but wonder that Micromax, which happen to be a dominating force in Indian market could drop to such level and be the only brand to slip. However, one of the main causes of Micromax’s downfall is that while the brand maintains a steady flow of new launches at regular intervals, these smartphones do not bring anything new to the table. Apart from a slight improvement in the specifications of the handsets, all smartphones from the brand are a carbon copy of each other. This is the major cause of downfall for the brand. Its rival brands like Motorola, Samsung, Lenovo, Xiaomi and LeTV are all bringing cutting edge technology with each new launch and every new smartphone from them are different from their predecessors.

What can Micromax do to recover lost ground?

To recover the lost grounds in Indian handset market, Micromax needs to hold its horses and focus more upon quality than quantity. The brand needs to understand that by launching hundred smartphones in a calendar year won’t work. Launching so many devices leads to confusion only in the mind of the end user. What Micromax needs to do is to invest more in research and development, study the competition and come up with fewer but more aggressive smartphones (in terms of specifications and features) that can take devices from the likes of Motorola and Xiaomi, heads on. This approach seems to be working for brands like Motorola that only launches three new devices every year but with class leading specifications and each generation of these handsets are class apart from each other.

Take the example of budget segment in smartphone market as of now, there are already smartphones flaunting full metal body, fingerprint scanner and full HD display among others. Micromax need to pull their resources invested in launching higher number of smartphones every year and concentrate them in launching fewer but value-for-money smartphones.

This article is contributed by Sanjeev who blogs about mobile technology on blog. You can get him on twitter @kumarsanjeev_me

© Raju PP for Technology Personalized, 2016. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact us, so we can take legal action immediately. If you are on Twitter you can follow me @rajupp! | Permalink |

The post Micromax Maintains Second Position in India, but Fast Losing Ground appeared first on Technology Personalized.


Related Stories

from Technology Personalized


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…