Skip to main content

A Look at Apple’s Top Heavy Plan to Offload Refurbished iPhone’s in India

It’s no secret that Apple has been trying to sell its used iPhones in India and had also asked for a nod from the authorities in 2015, which eventually failed. This time around the Cupertino company seems to be aggressively trying to barge in to the Indian markets with its used handsets, as a consequence of which it has once again appealed to the authorities. This time around, the local Indian smartphone manufacturers have become vocal and vehemently opposed Apple’s second hand goods for the Indian market. Let’s take a shot at deducing the scenario brick by brick.


The Need

iPhones have always been expensive for Indians, thanks to the slabs of import duties and the other related costs. As of now, Apple is said to have a marginal influence over the Indian market with shares less than two percent. This is quintessentially due to the fact that we have a wider and a more voracious market for budget smartphones, in fact one report states that the average smartphone selling price in India is pegged at $135 and is expected to fall to $102 in 2018, economy of scale? Well, Maybe.

We already have a slew of other handset makers offering premium phones and Apple wants to bring first time iPhone users on board, something that the iPhone SE was expected to do but the rather hefty price tag made it a bummer.

The Problem

Government has always kept a tab on import of used things, it has from long imposed a heavy 180% duties on importing a used car. While this might sound outrageous at the outset, we also need to gauge on the degree of adversity the local manufacturing market will face.

We Indians are especially sensitive when it comes to e-waste, the reason is that India has been the dumping ground for nearly 90% of the world’s e-waste, most of which is disposed off unscientifically. In spite of being refurbished and inspected thoroughly, the iPhones would already be in their midlife and in all likelihood the new owner might dispose the device after using it for around a year, which would result in faster e-waste generation.

The local manufacturers have been worrying that cheaper refurbished iPhones would eat into their share of sales and this is something that will ensure a strong opposition for Apple.

The Workaround

The best bet for Apple would be to reduce the price of base phones like the iPhone SE, like it did today in the US. Alternatively, it can also introduce aggressive exchange schemes that would attract buyers to cave in for an iPhone, the current exchange offers are passive, in the sense the quote for the used smartphone is way lower than the used market price. If it interests you, this document will walk you through the typical cycle a used electronics goes through once in United States, before it is refurbished and exported.

It shouldn’t be difficult for Apple to introduce a recycling scheme which would allow users to trade their unusable iPhone for a store credit. Remember the super cool Liam Robot Apple showcased recently, well that could be the answer for this problem. All said and done Apple should divert its focus from used handsets and instead should work towards other initiatives to being on board new customers, which also includes commissioning the manufacturing at the Indian Foxconn unit in the future.

© Raju PP for Technology Personalized, 2016. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact us, so we can take legal action immediately. If you are on Twitter you can follow me @rajupp! | Permalink |

The post A Look at Apple’s Top Heavy Plan to Offload Refurbished iPhone’s in India appeared first on Technology Personalized.


Related Stories

from Technology Personalized


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…