Skip to main content
Instapage

Facebook now lets brands target ads based on how much time, money you spent on their sites, apps

facebook-f-ad-target-fade-ss-1920

Ads on Facebook are about to get even more reflective of what you did on a brand’s site or app.

Two and a half years after Facebook started letting brands retarget people who visited their sites and mobile apps, the company is going to let them retarget people based on specific things they did on a brand’s site or app, such as how much time spent or how much money they spent.

The expansion of Facebook’s website custom audiences ad-targeting option is supposed to make it easier for brands to get in front of the most valuable members of their sites’ and apps’ audiences. “One of the challenges that marketers have is they’re seeing a lot of traffic to their websites and apps, but not all people are the same who come to their websites and apps,” said Maz Sharafi, director of monetization product marketing at Facebook.

Instead of just advertising to people who visited a site or specific page on a site, brands can pinpoint the people who visited a page or did something on the site a certain number of times. That could help brands make sure they aren’t wasting so much money on window shoppers and redirect those dollars to the people are getting more serious about buying something, like the ones who keep returning to check out a specific car model or review financing options.

“If someone were to visit the site five times in a given day or spend five whole minutes on a particular page, that’s a very different and stronger intent signal than someone who hits their website and just bounces off really quickly,” Sharafi said.

Since this type of ad targeting can weird out people who don’t expect their browsing of a brand’s site to follow them back to Facebook — let alone how much they spend on that site to be reflected in their Facebook feed — here’s a rundown of how this targeting works.

A brand gets a piece of code called a tracking pixel from Facebook that it inserts on its own site or app. That pixel keeps track of everyone that visits the brand’s property, and a brand can direct the pixel to log information like what pages the people visit, how long they’re on those pages for and how much money they spend when buying something on the site or in the app. A brand isn’t able to see exactly who this information corresponds to, but Facebook is able to match the logs against people’s Facebook profiles through a process called “hashing” that aggregates and anonymizes the audience lists. This matching is how a brand can then tell Facebook “Hey, show this specific ad to people who spent five minutes checking out my page about lease financing options” without the brand actually knowing who those people are.

In addition the new audience-retargeting options already mentioned, brands can create sub-segments of their site and app audiences based on how much time people spent doing something on the site, like configuring a car; how much money they have spent on the site or app; if they had shown interest in a specific date range, like someone looking to travel around the Fourth of July; and what device they used when visiting the brand’s property, such as if they were on a desktop computer or an Android device.

The New York Times used some of these new ad-targeting options to get more people to subscribe to its publication. As a result the amount of money the newspaper pays to try to turn someone into a subscriber was reduced by 25 percent and it got 2.3 times more people to subscribe, according to Sharafi.



via Marketing Land

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

Software Review Site TrustRadius Has A New Way to Treat Reviews Obtained Through Vendors

Online user reviews are the most powerful marketing technique for influencing purchase decisions. But do they accurately represent the views of most users?Today, business software review platform TrustRadius is announcing a new way — called trScore — to handle the bias introduced in reviews by users obtained through the vendor of the reviewed software product. The site says more than two million software buyers visit each year to check out its product reviews.To understand trScore, let’s first look at TrustRadius’ approach.The site says it authenticates all users through their LinkedIn profiles. It also requires users to answer eight to ten questions about the product, in order to weed out users having no familiarity. Additionally, a staff person reads every review before it is posted, and the site says about three percent of reviews are rejected for not meeting guidelines.As for the reviews themselves, TrustRadius puts them into two main buckets: independently-sourced reviews and ven…