Skip to main content
Instapage

Facebook to aim app install ads at people most likely to buy a product, complete a level

facebook-f-ad-target-fade-ss-1920

Sometimes mobile app developers may be better off burning their money than spending it on an app install ads. Sure, the ads may get people to download an app, but more often than not, people stop using an app within a month of downloading it. According to app marketing firm Localytics, only 42% of people who download an app use it a second time within a month of downloading it.

So Facebook wants to help app developers aim their ads at the people who are not only likely to install it but also likely to do things with it, like purchase a product, complete a game level or view a piece of content. The company’s goal is to give app developers better long-term results for their app install campaigns.

“One of the biggest problems in the ecosystem is retention and getting high-quality installs. A lot of the advertisers we’ve talked to said ‘Installs are great, but we really want to get people into our app who are going to be able to help build our business,’” said Facebook product manager Jehan Damji.

Facebook isn’t the only company trying to help app developers with this problem. Google rolled out a similar type of targeting for app developers in May 2016. Advertisers can target their Universal App Campaigns — which Google runs across its app store, search results, YouTube and display ad network — to people who are most likely to do specific things in their apps like spend a certain amount of money, complete a certain level or play their games a certain number of times.

But there are some initial differences between Facebook’s and Google’s version of app-event targeting, which Facebook calls “app event optimization” and which Google doesn’t seem to have a name for. For starters, Facebook’s version is now available worldwide, whereas Google’s remains in testing with a limited number of app developers.

Since Google’s version is still in testing, the search giant hasn’t yet compiled a complete list of app events that advertisers can target against. Meanwhile Facebook has 14 of them:

  1. Achieved Level
  2. App Launched
  3. Added Payment Info
  4. Added to Cart
  5. Added to Wishlist
  6. Completed Registration
  7. Completed Tutorial
  8. Initiated Checkout
  9. Purchased
  10. Rated
  11. Searched
  12. Spent Credits
  13. Unlocked Achievement
  14. Viewed Content

Advertisers will be able to filter their target audiences against any of the app events but will only be able to use one app event per campaign. So any game developer that wanted to home in on the Venn diagram of people likely to complete a level and sign up for a player account are SOL for now. Advertisers also won’t be able to specify parameters for each app event, like a certain product they want people to purchase or an individual article or video they want them to view.

To offer this kind of targeting, Facebook is applying all the data it’s collected over the years on the apps that people install through its ads as well as the data those apps send Facebook about how people are using them. These app advertisers have had the option of sending Facebook app events data in order to see how the people who install their apps through a Facebook ad end up using the app. Now that data will be cycled back into helping Facebook find more people likely to install developers’ apps and use it that way.

Facebook is also rolling a couple other products aimed to help app developers get people to install their apps. First app developers will now be able to use Facebook’s iAd-like Canvas mobile ad format for the app install campaigns. And second advertisers will be able to retarget people who check out a product on their sites with app install ads aimed at getting those people to buy the product in their apps.

The site-to-app retargeting is supposed to cater to brands who have traditionally centered their digital footprint around a website but want to start migrating people to their mobile apps. A potential drawback of this type of retargeting is that it adds another step someone has to complete before buying the product they had eyed and then abandoned, but Damji said app advertisers can use the app-event targeting with these dynamic ads to home in on the people more likely to install an app and complete a purchase in an app.



via Marketing Land

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…