Skip to main content

How OnePlus Dash Charge Differs from Other Technologies and Is it Any Better?

OnePlus has managed to retain its lost image in the market with their latest flagship – the OnePlus 3. While it satisfies every check on a modern smartphone’s must have feature list with high-end hardware and a sleek design, it also packs company’s new dedicated charging technology – Dash Charge which is based on OPPO’s VOOC and promises approximately 60% charge in about 30 minutes. Although, for most that’s nothing but marketing jargon, OnePlus has actually addressed a whole lot issues other manufacturers usually fail to acknowledge in the hunt for the best. So how different is OnePlus’ implementation and is it any better? Let’s find out


Less Heat, More Safe

The primary concern when it comes to any modern smartphone quick charger is not how much voltage or current is being released, what’s critical is how the OEM is controlling that. For achieving these elevated speeds, a controller is needed which in most cases, resides inside the handset itself. As a result, thanks to the metal bodies, that tiny device discharges a massive amount of heat which in turn makes our phones inconveniently warm. This directly impacts other components inside and results in battery and performance issues. Now, what OnePlus has done is that they have placed the controller inside the adapter a.k.a. the DASH charger. Hence, no matter how hot it gets, your OnePlus 3 is safe as sound.

Although, it is not a perfect solution to heating problems and has one huge drawback. The OnePlus 3 will only charge rapidly with the proprietary bundled charger and doesn’t support any other alternate standards like Qualcomm’s Quick Charge. So make sure you don’t forget to pack the DASH adapter while traveling or misplace it as getting an another one won’t be cheap.

data-line-1 (1)

Divide and Conquer

A general smartphone charging procedure involves juicing up the pack using a large amount of steady current. But with DASH, the power supply unit is treating a single battery pack as multiple separate units and charges them at constant speeds. This consequently results in a much greater pace when compared to any other common technique. OnePlus hasn’t specifically mentioned how the battery inside OnePlus 3 has been split, but to get a clear understanding – let’s assume the 3000mAh battery is broken down into 5 pieces, all of which receiving independent inputs at a rate of 1 Amp in parallel. All of which put together, allows the entire battery to get completely charged at 5 Amp. This approach, additionally, reduces the load on a single section and enhances hardware’s life expectancy.

A Healthier Affair

With decreased dissipation of heat and parallel charging, OnePlus 3 is much less prone to getting affected by internal burns and performance throttles. Moreover, the battery is uniformly receiving current which thoroughly increases the smartphone’s life expectancy. Most of the phones start show aging signs after 18 months but with OnePlus’ Dash charge, that’s less likely to happen. You can even play games or use GPS while the phone is connected to a socket and don’t have to worry about rendering problems.

It still bugs me though that OnePlus didn’t opt for a standard solution and improved it at some level. Having a dedicated power brick is definitely going to bug customers but in the end, you’re still getting a better experience overall.

© Raju PP for Technology Personalized, 2016. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact us, so we can take legal action immediately. If you are on Twitter you can follow me @rajupp! | Permalink |

The post How OnePlus Dash Charge Differs from Other Technologies and Is it Any Better? appeared first on Technology Personalized.


Related Stories

from Technology Personalized


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…