Skip to main content

The evolution of marketing platforms: From automation to journeys

Lessons Learned from the Evolution of Spam

In the beginning, marketing automation platforms grew other channels and tools around their core of email marketing. The basic mode involved if/then rules: if a customer takes this action, show this response.

But overlapping campaigns with if/then rules becomes very complicated very quickly, especially when you’re talking about millions of customers, each one in a different frame of mind, and each expecting his/her own personalized experience.

As a result, marketing platforms are evolving from their traditional if/then campaigns to the newer approach of customer journeys that are often guided by machine learning.

It’s the difference between setting up all the rules for the encounter on the one hand, B2B marketing startup YesPath CEO Jason Garoutte told me, and employing something like Netflix’s recommendation engine, on the other.

“Netflix doesn’t write rules about what [movie] you should watch next,” he pointed out. Instead, it makes inferences from what other people — who have a profile similar to yours and who chose similar films — also enjoy.

Of course, there are a variety of visions about this newest incarnation of marketing platforms. But there’s general agreement that:

  • it’s the next generation;
  • it often employs machine intelligence, such as machine learning, to learn from prior examples and thus move beyond marketer-defined rules;
  • it’s built from the ground-up to handle both traditional structured data (e.g., email mailing lists) and unstructured data (e.g., social data);
  • and it emphasizes the customer journey, especially which stage of the decision-making process the customer is in, instead of focusing on moving a prospect from one campaign to another. In other words, it’s less focused on individual trigger actions (like clicking on a link in an email) and more on the customer’s state (like what the customer needs at this point to come to a buying decision).

With traditional marketing automation platforms like Marketo or HubSpot, Garoutte said, the marketer sets rules to the effect of: “if this person comes to the website three times, invite them to a webinar.” Then, if they attend the webinar, email this brochure. And so on.

Hello, JOE

By contrast, he said, the new generation of marketing platform allows marketers to set a goal with a machine learning-based system, like optimizing for engagement. The platform looks at what kind of engagement tactics worked to turn similar website visitors into customers, and then recommends or undertakes those actions.

If the platform is rules-based, he noted, there are too many possible paths for a marketing to handle and still adequately provide a personalized experience. Customizing each customer journey, he pointed out, is “an edge.”

Marketing research firm Raab Associates’ David Raab describes this as a Journey Orchestration Engine, which has the easy-to-remember acronym of JOE.

Today’s many sources of customer data, he told me, “can give you a personal journey,” but it becomes an “adaptive journey” if it is guided by self-learning machine intelligence. I suggested a comparison between a missile that has been programmed by a large set of rules to reach its target, and one that essentially guides itself once the target is named.

“You need a smart machine,” he said, agreeing to the missile metaphor, to determine “the best way to reach the target.”

The reason: there’s too much data, too many customers, too many possible paths, and too little time for marketers to set up rules for personalized, segment-of-one marketing. The idea of a digital campaign, leftover from the days of broadcast media, is supplanted by the idea of a personalized journey that changes when the targeted person changes from unknown to known prospect, to interested person, to new or returning customer, all of which is individualized by a detailed profile.

It’s an evolution, he said, from marketing automation to adaptive marketing, pointing to such startups as Usermind, Pointillist, YesPath, and Thunderhead.

“More about marketers”

This approach, Raab said, is “more about marketers than consumers,” since marketers can’t possibly keep setting up all the rules for all personalized journeys.

This next generation of marketing is so compelling that many traditional marketing automation platforms, like Marketo and Salesforce, are firmly aboard.

Marketo’s Chief Scientist Shankar Venkataraman, for instance, told me that his company’s new Orion platform is “an event-based platform, oriented toward [customer] journeys.”

A journey is a series of events, he pointed out, and Orion — which is built specifically to accommodate a flood of all kinds of customer data — is part of Marketo’s movement from being campaign-oriented to event-oriented, targeting “a segment of 1.”

Similarly, Salesforce VP of Product Leslie Fine noted her company’s growing use of machine learning and the centrality of its Journey Builder. But, she told me, Salesforce is designed to handle both visions: the rules/campaign approach and the machine-informed customer journey.

Although Raab and Garoutte made the case to me that Salesforce was in the old camp, Fine said he company is capable of handling “both sides.”

“You have to do both,” she said. Some marketers still prefer rules-based campaigns, while the data deluge and the emerging Internet of Things world mean that human marketers cannot physically personalize every journey themselves.

There are “a lot of people for whom traditional marketing automation is good enough,” Garoutte said.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

Software Review Site TrustRadius Has A New Way to Treat Reviews Obtained Through Vendors

Online user reviews are the most powerful marketing technique for influencing purchase decisions. But do they accurately represent the views of most users?Today, business software review platform TrustRadius is announcing a new way — called trScore — to handle the bias introduced in reviews by users obtained through the vendor of the reviewed software product. The site says more than two million software buyers visit each year to check out its product reviews.To understand trScore, let’s first look at TrustRadius’ approach.The site says it authenticates all users through their LinkedIn profiles. It also requires users to answer eight to ten questions about the product, in order to weed out users having no familiarity. Additionally, a staff person reads every review before it is posted, and the site says about three percent of reviews are rejected for not meeting guidelines.As for the reviews themselves, TrustRadius puts them into two main buckets: independently-sourced reviews and ven…