Skip to main content

Facebook has started blocking desktop ad blockers


Facebook cares about consumer choice until that choice conflicts with its business.

On the one hand, Facebook doesn’t want people feeling super creeped out when they use its site or apps, so now it’s giving them a new way to control what data brands can use to target them with ads. But on the other hand it wants to ensure it makes money from the people who use its site or apps for free, so it’s not going to let them use it without seeing ads.

On Tuesday Facebook announced that it’s come up with a way to thwart ad blockers and show ads to people who visit its desktop sites with ad blockers enabled.

A Facebook spokesperson wasn’t immediately able to answer questions about how Facebook is able to override these ad blockers, whether it will be able to do so for mobile web ad blockers and if Facebook has ever paid ad blockers to not block its ads. Right now there isn’t a way to block ads within Facebook’s mobile app (or at least not one that doesn’t reroute a device’s internet connection to a third-party server).

According to The New York Times, Facebook is blocking ad blockers by identifying how those ad blockers recognize if a piece of content is an ad and then Facebook will disguise its ads to look like normal content. “For blockers to get around these changes, Facebook said they would have to begin analyzing the content of the ads themselves, a costly and laborious process,” per the Times.

Facebook is far from the first media company to try to foil ad blockers. A number of ad-tech companies have emerged that offer publishers software that prevents people who use ad blockers from visiting their sites unless they turn off the ad blockers, pay for access or agree to be shown some ads. And industry trade group the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) has even explored the possibility of suing ad blocker providers. Facebook’s entry into the fray gives cover to these companies and could pressure its competitors like Google that pay ad blocker providers to unblock its ads.

While people can no longer control whether they see any ads on Facebook’s desktop site, they are being given new controls over what kind of data advertisers can use to target them wherever Facebook can serve them ads, an olive branch of sorts to the people who use ad blockers because they feel like too-targeted ads violates their privacy.

Facebook will now show people who use its Ad Preferences tool which brands have their contact info or have added them to lists of people who have visited their sites or used their apps, and people will be able to disable those brands’ abilities to target them with ads on Facebook using that information, a targeting option Facebook calls Custom Audiences.


via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

Software Review Site TrustRadius Has A New Way to Treat Reviews Obtained Through Vendors

Online user reviews are the most powerful marketing technique for influencing purchase decisions. But do they accurately represent the views of most users?Today, business software review platform TrustRadius is announcing a new way — called trScore — to handle the bias introduced in reviews by users obtained through the vendor of the reviewed software product. The site says more than two million software buyers visit each year to check out its product reviews.To understand trScore, let’s first look at TrustRadius’ approach.The site says it authenticates all users through their LinkedIn profiles. It also requires users to answer eight to ten questions about the product, in order to weed out users having no familiarity. Additionally, a staff person reads every review before it is posted, and the site says about three percent of reviews are rejected for not meeting guidelines.As for the reviews themselves, TrustRadius puts them into two main buckets: independently-sourced reviews and ven…