Skip to main content

Facebook paid $22 billion for WhatsApp’s user data and now it’s getting it


Facebook didn’t pony up $22 billion for WhatsApp just for its messaging app. Facebook was exchanging one type of currency for another that it’s been able to cash into billions: data. And now it’s getting it.

WhatsApp updated its privacy policy on Thursday to state that it will now be sharing people’s account information — but not their messages — with Facebook, unless people follow these steps to opt out within 30 days.

That means Facebook will be able to match the phone numbers people submit when signing up for WhatsApp to the ones they may have attached to their Facebook profiles to connect those accounts. Facebook will be able to use that connection and the data it gets from WhatsApp like people’s contact lists to figure out which ads or other content to show people on Facebook.

It’s a clever loophole to honor the letter, but not necessarily the spirit, of the pledge WhatsApp made to its users shortly after the Facebook deal was announced in February 2014.

“Respect for your privacy is coded into our DNA, and we built WhatsApp around the goal of knowing as little about you as possible: You don’t have to give us your name and we don’t ask for your email address. We don’t know your birthday. We don’t know your home address. We don’t know where you work. We don’t know your likes, what you search for on the internet or collect your GPS location. None of that data has ever been collected and stored by WhatsApp, and we really have no plans to change that,” WhatsApp wrote in a company blog post in March 2014.

This remains true. But WhatsApp doesn’t need any of that data. For 1.7 billion people around the world — a good number of which are likely among WhatsApp’s 1 billion users — Facebook already has it.

Thursday’s privacy policy changes appear to mark the first and second steps in Facebook doing with WhatsApp what it has spent the past few years doing with Instagram.

Step 1) Find a way to match someone across their Facebook and Instagram accounts.
Step 2) Use that match to accumulate more data about that person.
Step 3) Apply that data in targeting that person with ads and content recommendations on both Facebook and Instagram.

Facebook is already approaching step three with WhatsApp. In January WhatsApp said sometime this year it will start testing ways for businesses to send messages to people using its service. It didn’t explicitly say businesses would pay for the privilege — qualifying these messages as ads — but that seems to be the gist. And WhatsApp doubled-down on that plan with Thursday’s privacy policy update.

In a section titled “Commercial Messaging,” WhatsApp tells businesses will be able to send messages with “order, transaction, and appointment information, delivery and shipping notifications, product and service updates, and marketing.”

“Messages you may receive containing marketing could include an offer for something that might interest you. We do not want you to have a spammy experience; as with all of your messages, you can manage these communications, and we will honor the choices you make,” according to WhatsApp’s updated privacy policy, which doesn’t outline how people will be able to manage these marketing messages.

This sounds a lot like how Facebook has started bringing ads into its home-grown messaging service, Messenger. After opening up Messenger to business messages like order receipts and shipping notifications in 2015, this year Facebook started testing a way for businesses to pay to send messages to people who are already connected to them on Messenger.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…