Skip to main content

Report: Apple may be six months from launching an Echo-like Siri assistant


A second report, from Bloomberg, says that Apple is developing an Amazon Echo-like stand alone virtual assistant based on Siri. That rumor was first reported in May by The Information.

The project apparently dates from roughly two years ago and is now in the testing phase according to Bloomberg. “People familiar with the matter” who “asked not to be identified” also indicated that it’s intended to be a smart-home controller like Amazon Alexa. Accordingly it would tap into Apple’s HomeKit, which enables Siri to control third party smart home applications, appliances and services.

According to the report, Apple seeks to leapfrog the Echo and Google’s recently announced Home device with “more advanced microphone and speaker technology,” as well as facial recognition. The article says prototype devices are currently in Apple employees’ homes and that time to market could be as short as six months or up to a year from now — provided the product actually comes to market.

At its WWDC conference in June, Apple introduced an API that enables developers to more deeply integrate with Siri. Those doing so and using the API will also benefit if there’s a stand-alone Siri device, and vice versa.

Currently Amazon Alexa has more than 2,500 “skills,” most of which offer third-party content. (Discovery is a problem, however.) Transactions are already available for selected skills, with more to follow. Transactions (e.g., reservations) are also an announced part of the Google Home roadmap. The one major company that appears not to — but probably should — have a smart home virtual assistant in the works is Microsoft (Cortana).

Echo is one of Amazon’s best-selling products and a successful Siri device could create a new hardware category for Apple. The challenge is that it would need to be clearly different/better, given Amazon’s momentum and the imminent launch of Google Home, which will have some advanced “conversational search” capabilities.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

How to Get SMS Alerts for Gmail via Twitter

How do you get SMS notifications on your mobile phone for important emails in your Gmail? Google doesn’t support text notifications for their email service but Twitter does. If we can figure out a way to connect our Twitter and Gmail accounts, the Gmail notifications can arrive as text on our mobile via Twitter. Let me explain:Twitter allows you to follow any @user via a simple SMS. They provide short codes for all countries (see list) and if you text FOLLOW to this shortcode following by the  username, any tweets from that user will arrive in your phone as text notifications. For instance, if you are in the US, you can tweet FOLLOW labnol to 40404 to get my tweets as text messages. Similarly, users in India can text FOLLOW labnol to 9248948837 to get the tweets via SMS.The short code service of Twitter can act as a Gmail SMS notifier. You create a new Twitter account, set the privacy to private and this account will send a tweet when you get a new email in Gmail. Follow this account …

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…