Skip to main content
Instapage

Report: 93 percent of brands and retailers misaligned, harming omnichannel efforts

phone and shopping bags_ss_1920

Omnichannel is both an overused buzzword and perhaps, in idealized form, an unattainable goal. In its simplest formulation, it’s an effort to deliver consistent brand and shopping experiences to the consumer across platforms, devices and stores. It also connotes a 360-degree understanding of the customer.

In a new survey and report from Netsertive and the CMO Council, “189 senior marketing leaders with organizations that currently sell products through a physical retail channel” were asked about their omnichannel strategies. Though this isn’t made explicit, respondents are brands that sell primarily through third party retailers (e.g., appliance brand that sells via third party appliance retailer).

Asked about which media channels are most critical, these survey respondents said:

  • Digital advertising (generally) — 60 percent
  • Corporate websites
 — 56 percent
  • Mobile — 54.4 percent
  • Social media channels — 51.2 percent
  • Email — 47.2 percent
  • Local in-store engagement and promotions — 40 percent
  • Live events — 24.8 percent
  • Local retail partners and resellers — 22.4 percent
  • Television advertising — 21.6 percent
  • Digital video
 — 19.2 percent
  • Traditional print advertising — 19.2 percent
  • Direct mail or printed inserts — 16 percent
  • Radio advertising — 8.8 percent
  • Partner websites and social channels — 8 percent

The overwhelming majority of respondents (94 percent) said that omnichannel “is either important or critical to reaching their business goals.” Indeed, these brands need drive people into physical stores to buy their products. Yet there’s ambivalence (or ignorance) about the importance of coordinating digital and offline retail experiences: “88 percent of brands don’t consider local retail partners to be a critical ally in achieving business outcomes.”

One of the primary findings in the document is that available measurement tools are not being utilized. For example, the report finds less than 25 percent of brand respondents are using tools such as Google Store Visits, FourSquare or LiveRamp to measure the impact of digital on offline commerce.

Netsertive argues that despite the ambition and effort to drive in-store visits and sales, the omnichannel breakdown for brands often comes in the last mile because brands and retailers are effectively not aligned:

[M]arketers are struggling to align strategies with their local retail partners. In fact, only 7 percent of marketers believe they are fully aligned with local partners, feeling that both brand and retail partners are in lock step with seamlessly executed brand campaigns.

Netsertive report

Brands are spending money to drive in-store visits and engagement. Simultaneously budget and media planning decisions are being made on the basis of perceived ROI. However brands may not have an accurate picture of ROI if they’re not properly measuring offline behavior:

As noted earlier, 42 percent of marketers admit they are struggling to measure the impact of digital marketing efforts specific to their ability to drive in-store sales and engagements. And, while 23 percent are using third-party tools like Google Store Visits or FourSquare Attribution, few measurement options are in play, with only 3 percent tracking e-receipts, 6 percent tracking in-store redemption of promotional offers delivered via digital channels, and 10 percent tracking digital coupon redemption.

The document also faults brands for wanting to exercise too much control over media and not putting the consumer first in the omnichannel process, which is ironic since that’s what omnichannel, by definition, is supposed to be about. The report goes on to make the following general recommendations to brands (I’ve paraphrased them):

  • Think beyond the digital channels you can measure and control today
  • Consider the impact that a cohesive brand-to-local marketing strategy could have on bridging the gap in the customer experience
  • Overlooking local retail as a critical element of an omnichannel strategy will result in lost customers and sales
  • Focus on customers’ purchasing behaviors to better align digital and physical elements of an omnichannel strategy


via Marketing Land

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

Software Review Site TrustRadius Has A New Way to Treat Reviews Obtained Through Vendors

Online user reviews are the most powerful marketing technique for influencing purchase decisions. But do they accurately represent the views of most users?Today, business software review platform TrustRadius is announcing a new way — called trScore — to handle the bias introduced in reviews by users obtained through the vendor of the reviewed software product. The site says more than two million software buyers visit each year to check out its product reviews.To understand trScore, let’s first look at TrustRadius’ approach.The site says it authenticates all users through their LinkedIn profiles. It also requires users to answer eight to ten questions about the product, in order to weed out users having no familiarity. Additionally, a staff person reads every review before it is posted, and the site says about three percent of reviews are rejected for not meeting guidelines.As for the reviews themselves, TrustRadius puts them into two main buckets: independently-sourced reviews and ven…