Skip to main content

Research: location a primary buying consideration for 43 percent of consumers


The consumer path to purchase has become increasingly complex, with multiple channels and devices playing a role in influencing buying decisions. However, beyond devices and channels, new research from YP (conducted by Thrive Analytics) examines the “primary” and “secondary” content variables and other factors that influence consumer purchases.

Thrive surveyed 5,418 US adults about their shopping behaviors in the past three months, across multiple verticals. The survey found, consistent with other research, that consumers use multiple devices and tend to shop in multiple locations, although the majority of shopping begins “at home” (76 percent).

The survey found a relatively low 57 percent of consumers use mobile devices throughout the entire process. It also discovered a lower average number of sources (2.9) used than earlier research. For example, Google in 2011 reported that consumers used roughly 10 sources to make purchase decisions.

YP thrive primary and secondary shopping influences

The most interesting findings, as mentioned, concern the influence of “primary” and “secondary” sources of information that consumers consult. Primary information, as the name suggests, consists of key variables like pricing and services offered. Location was also a significant, primary consideration.

According to the report, primary information was determinative for just over half (52%) of consumers — meaning they used those considerations exclusively. However just under half (48 percent) of consumers went beyond primary information to make their purchase decisions on the basis of other grounds. This category includes reviews and referrals, coupons and other intangible information (e.g., photos/videos). This is an argument for enhanced content and complete profiles if there ever was one.

YP thrive primary and secondary shopping influences

Interestingly, the report finds that the consumers who relied on secondary information “spent twice as much (on average) than those relying just on primary information.”

The report also identified the factors that dissuaded consumers from buying from a business:

  • High pricing: 62 percent
  • Negative reviews: 55 percent
  • Inconsistent information: 37 percent
  • Inaccurate website information: 37 percent
  • Bad contact information: 32 percent
  • No website (30 percent) or poor website experience (26 percent)

The most obvious takeaway here is the need for businesses large or small to have a consistent and complete presence across channels.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…