Skip to main content

The Galaxy Note 7 Fiasco: 7 Things Tech Companies Need to Learn

So perhaps we are coming to the close of the regrettable chapter that is the Galaxy Note 7. It has been more than a month since we first heard of Galaxy Note 7 devices exploding and after dozens of incidents, several recalls and repairs and replacements and hundreds of cynical memes, it seems that the Korean giant is finally giving up the ghost on the device that was supposed to be its flagship. And while there will be multiple post mortems, recriminations, and prolonged analysis, we really think that the whole crisis escalated because of what seems in rosy retrospect a lack of simple common sense at times. Of course, it is easy to be wise after the event and we have no way of knowing what actually transpired in Samsung and well, it might be a while before we really know what went wrong with the device, but based on what we DO know, there are seven things that tech companies can learn from the whole sorry episode:


1. React swiftly

For a company that churns out devices so quickly and is known for its turn of speed, Samsung’s reaction to the entire “explosive” crisis has tended to be generally on the slow side. Official reactions tended to trickle in hours and some times even days, after reports, giving rumor mills ample time to run amok. In the age of light speed social networking which thrives on negativity and bad news, that was not very clever.

2. React prominently and clearly

Not only were the reactions to the news of exploding devices delayed, they were also less than distinct and at times seemed fuzzy. It was not clear if the device was being recalled or how it would be replaced. Contrast this with the way Samsung’s arch-rival Apple took on the antenna-gate crisis in 2010, with Steve Jobs addressing a briefing on the subject, discussing the problem in detail, and suggesting solutions. Yes, his statement that iPhone owners’ were holding the phone wrong did invite a fair amount of criticism, but all said and done, the company had got a clear statement out in the field and had shown it was aware of a potential problem. With Samsung, alas, things were not that clear for quite a while (some might claim they are still not clear).

3. There are no “isolated incidents”

When reports of there being problems with Nokia’s batteries had started trickling in 2007, the initial reaction in many quarters (of the media and indeed in the trade) had been that these were one-offs. However, the company itself reacted very swiftly with one executive telling me rather bluntly “when it’s dangerous, there are no isolated incidents.” The result was one of the most comprehensive and swift product recalls we have seen in tech history. We suspect that the “isolated incident” mindset might have dogged Samsung’s initial reaction to the Note 7 crisis – witness the “only 35 cases have been reported globally” statement that was issued in early September. The fact that the company was claiming that the crisis was not a major one even as airlines were banning its products on flights sent out contradictory signals to the consumers.

4. If it’s dangerous, recall – do not replace or repair

There are some problems that can be fixed by repairs (Apple issued bumpers for the Antennagate crisis) or by giving public assurances of replacements (for l’affaire Bendgate), but there is one option when the product is perceived as being dangerous – that of pulling it off the market altogether. The kind of damage that the exploding devices were causing should have necessitated a quick recall rather than the attempts to issue replacements or try to repair matters. “Something is suspected of exploding and you try to issue another version that you say will not explode – that’s not very clever. Take the damn thing back, make refunds. You can fix matters later,” was the opinion of one for the PR executives involved in the famous Nokia battery recall.

5. Do not hand out replacements too soon

Saying ‘we have fixed what’s wrong’ too quickly is a mistake. Take your time before issuing a replacement – it assures the public that you have researched the issue heavily,” an executive from a mobile company told us when news of Samsung offering replacement units for the Note 7 trickled in. As the replacement units too started developing problems, it became increasingly apparent that Samsung might have tried to paper over the cracks rather than plaster them away. We know this is more of an engineering decision than a marketing one, but given the dimension of what was happening, being slow here might have been a better option.

6. Do not try to get praise for fixing your own problem

There was widespread resentment in some quarters over the manner in which Samsung’s communications department went into overdrive to publicize details of how the company was doing its utmost to recall defective units and the costs involved in the process. While there is no doubting the efforts of the company in this regard, its efforts to get positive mileage out of them were seen by many as an attempt to whitewash its mistakes and ended up having negative repercussions. Perhaps it would have been better to undertake such a campaign well after the crisis. Which brings us to the final point…

7. Sorry should not be the hardest word

One of the cardinal rules of crisis communications is : “when you think you have made a mistake, and that has endangered someone, say “sorry” first.” And while Samsung has issued its share of apologies, including one from their mobile chief, Koh dong-Jin, recently, the stark fact is that the time they took in coming, and their initial tone detracted from their effectiveness. “A simple, unqualified apology would have had more effect than trying to minimize the impact of what was happening or trying to gain mileage from the efforts being made to recall the device. It can be confusing for the company initially because they have tried their best – no one puts a bad product out in the market deliberately – but it is always better to apologize right away, and particularly so if the product is endangering consumers,” an executive involved in the handling of the 2011 Sony PlayStation Network crisis, in which credit card details of many users were compromised, told me.

© Raju PP for Technology Personalized, 2016. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact us, so we can take legal action immediately. If you are on Twitter you can follow me @rajupp! | Permalink |

The post The Galaxy Note 7 Fiasco: 7 Things Tech Companies Need to Learn appeared first on Technology Personalized.


Related Stories

from Technology Personalized


Popular posts from this blog

How to Get SMS Alerts for Gmail via Twitter

How do you get SMS notifications on your mobile phone for important emails in your Gmail? Google doesn’t support text notifications for their email service but Twitter does. If we can figure out a way to connect our Twitter and Gmail accounts, the Gmail notifications can arrive as text on our mobile via Twitter. Let me explain:Twitter allows you to follow any @user via a simple SMS. They provide short codes for all countries (see list) and if you text FOLLOW to this shortcode following by the  username, any tweets from that user will arrive in your phone as text notifications. For instance, if you are in the US, you can tweet FOLLOW labnol to 40404 to get my tweets as text messages. Similarly, users in India can text FOLLOW labnol to 9248948837 to get the tweets via SMS.The short code service of Twitter can act as a Gmail SMS notifier. You create a new Twitter account, set the privacy to private and this account will send a tweet when you get a new email in Gmail. Follow this account …

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…