Skip to main content
Instapage

Medium will eliminate its Promoted Stories ad product following layoffs

money-mouse_131046845-ss-1920

Medium’s advertising product never made it out of beta.

The publishing platform created by Twitter co-founder Evan Williams will shut down its Promoted Stories ad product that had been released in beta in April 2016, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The decision to eliminate its ad product coincides with Medium rethinking its business model and laying off 50 employees, or one-third of its staff, on Wednesday. Williams announced the latter moves in a blog post published on Wednesday, but he did not specify the status of Medium’s advertising business. A Medium spokesperson referred a request for comment to the blog post.

Medium introduced Promoted Stories in April as a way for the platform and publishers, like The Awl, The Bold Italic and Pacific Standard, that call Medium home to make money. Advertisers would pay to have their own Medium posts placed at the bottom of those publishers’ Medium posts. Brands like Bose, SoFi and Intel were among the first to buy Medium’s ad product, but it’s unclear how Promoted Stories performed and whether the ad format could lay the foundation for a sustainable revenue stream. Based on Williams’ blog post, it seems to have laid the wrong foundation.

“In building out this model, we realized we didn’t yet have the right solution to the big question of driving payment for quality content. We had started scaling up the teams to sell and support products that were, at best, incremental improvements on the ad-driven publishing model, not the transformative model we were aiming for,” Williams wrote.

Of the 50 employees Medium has laid off, most worked in “sales, support, and other business functions,” according to Williams. While Medium could conceivably continue to sell its Promoted Stories with a skeletal sales staff or rely on outside ad sales firms like Nativ.ly that had helped to arrange Medium’s initial advertiser deals, the company appears to be getting out of advertising altogether, at least for now.

“It’s clear that the broken system is ad-driven media on the internet. It simply doesn’t serve people,” Williams wrote.

And Medium may not have been able to serve its ads to enough people. In December 2016 the company said that 60 million people visited its platform in November, up 140 percent from 25 million the year before. That’s a lot of people, but it’s less if you’re an advertiser who can get in front of many times more people on Facebook, Google or even Twitter with more precision than what blog post those people are reading.

Thanks to digital platforms’ abilities to pinpoint brands’ ads to large numbers of individual with specifics characteristics, digital advertising has swung to center itself, for better or worse, around the audience that brands can get in front of, not the content they can appear adjacent to. Historically content may have served as a proxy for the audience a publisher could offer. After all the content historically had served as a proxy for the audience, but that proxy is no longer needed with all the behavioral tracking that companies like Facebook and Google do to build audience profiles. As a result advertisers have devalued content, which has made it difficult for media companies like Medium and those who publish on its platform to reap the right value for their content.

Medium’s advertising revenue may be on pause, if not kaput, but Medium’s platform is not. According to Williams, Medium is looking into other business models. He didn’t state what those other business models may be, but they appear to be centered on readers, not advertisers, paying for content. Medium already introduced a subscription revenue stream in April so that individual publishers could charge people to check out their content and split the money with Medium.



via Marketing Land

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…