Skip to main content

WebMD’s new Alexa health skill should go to pharmacy school

WebMD just launched an Alexa skill that promises to answer health and medical questions. But it seems there’s a lot it doesn’t know.

The company’s press release offers a number of sample questions the assistant can potentially answer:

  • “Alexa, ask WebMD to tell me about type 2 diabetes.”
  • “Alexa, ask WebMD to tell me about amoxicillin.”
  • “Alexa, ask WebMD what is an echocardiogram.”
  • “Alexa, ask WebMD what are the side effects of steroids.”
  • “Alexa, ask WebMD what are the symptoms of a heart attack.”
  • “Alexa, ask WebMD what I can eat after a workout.”

The user reviews on Amazon generally fault the skill for not being able understand drug names. This was consistent with my experience. I asked about a number of prescription and generic drugs (e.g., acetaminophen), and it was unable to recognize most of them (even after repeated, slow attempts).

It was able to answer some basic questions about health and medical symptoms (“What’s the best way to treat a cold?”). But the overall experience is frustrating. This includes the general way that users must invoke particular skills: “Alexa, ask ___.” At least in this case, WebMD’s skill invites follow-up questions so you don’t have to do that for each query.

Google Home performed dramatically better than the WebMD skill across the same set of drug and side effects-related questions. It was able to recognize drug names and provided answers to all my questions. Admittedly, this wasn’t a systematic test, but it illustrates the potentially significant advantages that Google’s vast index and speech recognition capabilities bring to the competition.

Google also has content deals with several medical data providers, such as Mayo Clinic. So, in this case, WebMD’s Alexa skill has no advantage over Google. The ability of Amazon and Alexa to compete over the long term depends on third-party skills and data providers such as WebMD.

WebMD deserves credit for being an early adopter, and it’s not entirely clear where the problems reside, whether with the skill itself or Amazon’s speech recognition or both. While there are general “I’m still learning” disclaimers that come with some of the Alexa skills, Amazon and its third-party partners need to do a better job of managing and delivering against user expectations.

The WebMD experience was disappointing. Accordingly, there’s some brand exposure here.

Amazon needs to take a page from Apple and be more assertive about quality guidelines to ensure that its skills meet some minimum threshold of utility and usability. Right now, there are a lot of mediocre skills out there.

Better to have 100 great and useful voice apps than 10,000, many of which are weak or simply don’t work well.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

How to Get SMS Alerts for Gmail via Twitter

How do you get SMS notifications on your mobile phone for important emails in your Gmail? Google doesn’t support text notifications for their email service but Twitter does. If we can figure out a way to connect our Twitter and Gmail accounts, the Gmail notifications can arrive as text on our mobile via Twitter. Let me explain:Twitter allows you to follow any @user via a simple SMS. They provide short codes for all countries (see list) and if you text FOLLOW to this shortcode following by the  username, any tweets from that user will arrive in your phone as text notifications. For instance, if you are in the US, you can tweet FOLLOW labnol to 40404 to get my tweets as text messages. Similarly, users in India can text FOLLOW labnol to 9248948837 to get the tweets via SMS.The short code service of Twitter can act as a Gmail SMS notifier. You create a new Twitter account, set the privacy to private and this account will send a tweet when you get a new email in Gmail. Follow this account …

Instagram Story links get 15-25% swipe-through rates for brands, publishers

Instagram may arrived late as a traffic source for brands and publishers, but it’s already showing early signs of success, driving new visitors to their sites and even outperforming its parent company, Facebook.For years brands, publishers and other have tried to push people from the Facebook-owned photo-and-video-sharing app to their sites. Outside of ads and excepting a recent test with some retailers, Instagram didn’t offer much help to companies looking to use it to drive traffic. So they had to find workarounds. They put links in their Instagram bios. They scrawled short-code URLs onto their pictures. And they typed out links in their captions.Then last month Instagram finally introduced an official alternative to these hacky workarounds: the ability for verified profiles to insert links in their Instagram Stories.Almost a month after the launch, 15% to 25% of the people who see a link in an Instagram Story are swiping on it, according to a handful of brands and publishers that h…

In the age of RankBrain, these foundational SEO issues still matter

There are at least 200 ranking factors in Google’s algorithm (not to mention RankBrain), which means a thorough SEO audit could lead to dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of SEO tasks. Few companies have the budget or resources to complete every potential SEO to-do item — and doing so would be an incredible waste of time and resources anyway. Some SEO tasks are critical and cannot be ignored; others just aren’t worth your time.Prioritizing an SEO task list is crucial. Focus your resources on SEO work that is actually going to improve rankings, increase clicks and drive revenue. Most companies should focus on engagement SEO work, but technical tasks can’t be ignored completely — especially if you have major problems.[Read the full article on Search Engine Land.]

via Marketing Land