Skip to main content

ISPs and mobile carriers vow not to sell user browsing histories — for now

Last week, Congress voted to overturn online privacy rules created by the Obama FCC, which had not yet gone into effect. The rules required opt-in consent before ISPs (broadband and mobile carriers) could collect and sell user data for ad targeting purposes.

Republicans in Congress decried the new FCC rules as more government overreach. However, privacy advocates criticized Congress’s action as selling out consumers to corporate interests. Carriers and ISPs sought the action so, as they argue, they would be on more equal footing with Google and Facebook for ad targeting purposes.

The legislation will become law if signed by President Trump. And he is expected to sign it as part of the broader effort to minimize government regulation and “dismantle the administrative state.”

When both the House and the Senate passed the legislation, there was a widespread outcry among privacy and consumer advocates. Numerous articles appeared over the weekend about how consumers might combat tracking of their browsing histories. VPNs seem to be the only real option; incognito mode won’t work.

Anticipating rising consumer hostility and skepticism, Comcast, Verizon and AT&T came out with statements on Friday saying that they would not sell individuals’ browsing histories. Here are excerpts collected by Reuters:

  • “We do not sell our broadband customers’ individual web browsing history. We did not do it before the FCC’s rules were adopted, and we have no plans to do so,” said Gerard Lewis, Comcast’s chief privacy officer.
  • Verizon does not sell personal web browsing histories and has no plans to do so in the future, said spokesman Richard Young.
  • AT&T says in its privacy statement it “will not sell your personal information to anyone, for any purpose. Period.” In a blog post Friday, AT&T said it would not change those policies after Trump signs the repeal.

The key word here is “individuals.” The ISPs will likely collect and sell aggregated user data. That’s no different from widespread ad-platform practice online already. But it’s interesting that these companies may seek to maintain higher privacy standards than the law requires because of potentially negative consumer reaction. (We’ll see.)

Indeed, the passage of the legislation has already contributed to a further erosion of trust in these brands, which are in a pretty weak position among consumers already. That’s especially true of Comcast, which remains “America’s most hated company.”

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…