Skip to main content

Google pushes AMP Ads adoption, announces Celtra & MOAT integrations

Last July, Google introduced broad support for AMP-enabled ads and landing pages in DoubleClick. Now, Google wants to make AMP the standard for ads across the mobile web.

“Things written in AMP, even if they are ads, cannot have poor performance,” said  AMP Ads Initiative tech lead Michael Kleber at Google I/O Thursday. “Everything written in AMP is guaranteed to have good performance properties, and that extends to ads also.”

In Thursday’s presentation, Google introduced several initiatives to increase adoption of AMP ads, including partnerships with Celtra and MOAT and a native video player. Features critical to advertisers — such as viewabilty monitoring, analytics, click protection and other back-end functions — are also now built into the AMP ads framework.

In addition to standard text and image ad formats, there are now six new AMP ad templates, including a carousel ad format, a video parallax unit and a lightbox format. Demos and examples are available here.

Celtra, a creative management platform integration used by 3,500 brands, now supports AMP ad creation in the platform with an easy-to-use tool.

And to increase publisher adoption of video ads in AMP, Google introduced a built-in video player. AMP has always supported video ads and content, but with the native AMP video player, publishers will be able to support video ad content easily without having to partner with a third party. AMP pre-roll videos do not autoplay.

The MOAT integration with AMP ads using the AMP analytics framework to provide viewability and audience verification analytics for AMP ads. AMP ads are supported by more than 100 ad networks, such as Sharethrough, Triplelift and Kargo.

Google said AMP ads will eventually be able to work with any HTML pages, not just AMP pages.

Watch the full presentation below. The ads portion begins around the 12:50 mark.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…