Skip to main content
Instapage

EU Commissioner: Two remaining antitrust cases against Google ‘advancing’

While Google’s appeal of the $2.9 billion (€2.4 billion) fine imposed by the European Commission in 2017 makes its way forward, EU Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager told colleagues that the other two antitrust cases against Google were “advancing.” That’s according to a report from Reuters.

Those cases involve exclusivity provisions in Google AdSense agreements and app-install requirements in Android-OEM contracts.

The “search bias” antitrust fine against Google was the largest in EU history. But it doesn’t represent the maximum potential fine. The European Commission (EC) can impose penalties of up to 10 percent of total global revenues, which would represent $11 billion (€8.9 billion), in terms of 2017 revenue.

In addition to any future fines, it’s expected that the EC will require Google to remove its app pre-install requirements from Android phone-maker agreements as it has been asked to do in Russia. However, the actual impact on Google rivals in Europe remains to be seen. Users could simply install the desired apps from the Google Play store.

In the wake of the shopping search penalty and remedy, Google’s competitors have complained that the measures taken don’t go far enough and “aren’t working.” This raises the complex question: what exactly does “working” mean? (This issue is likely to arise repeatedly in any remedial scenario involving Google and competitors.)

Google has said that the changes made comply with the EC’s order and that other shopping services are being treated equally. However, it appears that some of Google’s rivals are seeking government intervention to “restore their traffic” or compensate for more fundamental problems in their sites or businesses.

The post EU Commissioner: Two remaining antitrust cases against Google ‘advancing’ appeared first on Marketing Land.



via Marketing Land

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become majestic.com. Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of majestic.com (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…