Skip to main content

Twitter reported to be under investigation for violating GDPR

According to a Fortune report Friday, Twitter is under investigation by Irish privacy authorities for violating the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Michael Veale, a privacy researcher at the Unversity College London, filed a report with the Irish data protection authority (DPA) complaining that Twitter refused to give him records on what kind of data was collected by him.

Veale’s request was prompted by suspicions that the social media platform collects additional data on users that click on links made by its link-shortening service,, and that it drops cookies into user browsers to track them after they leave.

Under GDPR, data subjects are allowed to ask companies to provide a copy of the data they collect, as well as amend, move and delete it. Companies found in breach of GDPR can be assessed fees up to €20 million, or 4 percent of their annual revenue, whichever is higher.

When Veale asked for a copy of his data, Twitter told him no, saying it would take a “disproportionate effort,” an exception allowed under GDPR. Veale said that Twitter was wrong, and that the exemption cannot be used to refuse the type of request he made.

Why you should care

Eyal Katz, senior marketing manager for Namogoo’s GDPR Insights, said that if is considered by the authorities to help “enrich personal data with click tracking history, then the entire martech ecosystem could be heading for a GDPR tailspin.”

GDPR carries fines of up to 4 percent of a company’s total global revenue.

“Twitter may find themselves in a bind here because even if they don’t necessarily collect personal data themselves using, they most likely share that information with other third-party tracking and monitoring software providers,” Katz said. “Those providers can use’s click tracking data to enrich their own, and create an online persona that can then be used to target online marketing campaigns … it is predominantly online publishers that face the most risk because like Twitter, Facebook, and Google, it is publishers who are the data collectors in this scenario and they will need to keep a very close eye on their software vendors.”

More about the news

  • This is the first GDPR investigation for Twitter. European regulators are already investigating complaints against Facebook and Google.
  • Veale is a veteran agitator: he prompted a similar probe into Facebook earlier this year. He issued this complaint against Twitter to the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) because Twitter’s European operations headquarters are in Dublin.
  • Forbes reports that because the complaint “involves cross-border processing,” it would likely to be handled by the new European Data Protection Board, which coordinates DPA GDPR efforts across regions.

The post Twitter reported to be under investigation for violating GDPR appeared first on Marketing Land.

via Marketing Land


Popular posts from this blog

6 types of negative SEO to watch out for

The threat of negative SEO is remote but daunting. How easy is it to for a competitor to ruin your rankings, and how do you protect your site? But before we start, let’s make sure we’re clear on what negative SEO is, and what it definitely isn’t.Negative SEO is a set of activities aimed at lowering a competitor’s rankings in search results. These activities are more often off-page (e.g., building unnatural links to the site or scraping and reposting its content); but in some cases, they may also involve hacking the site and modifying its content.Negative SEO isn’t the most likely explanation for a sudden ranking drop. Before you decide someone may be deliberately hurting your rankings, factor out the more common reasons for ranking drops. You’ll find a comprehensive list here.Negative off-page SEOThis kind of negative SEO targets the site without internally interfering with it. Here are the most common shapes negative off-page SEO can take.Link farmsOne or two spammy links likely won’…

Another SEO tool drops the word “SEO”

This guest post is by Majestic’s Marketing Director, Dixon Jones, who explains the reasons for their recent name change.
Majestic, the link intelligence database that many SEOs have come to use on a daily basis, has dropped the “SEO” from it’s brand and from its domain name, to become Since most people won’t have used Google’s site migration tool before, here’s what it looks like once you press the “go” button:

In actual fact – there’s a minor bug in the tool. The address change is to the https version of (which GWT makes us register as a separate site) but that message incorrectly omits that. Fortunately, elsewhere in GWT its clear the omission is on Google’s side, not a typo from the SEO. It is most likely that the migration tool was developed before the need for Google to have separate verification codes for http and https versions of the site.
The hidden costs of a name change
There were a few “nay sayers” on Twitter upset that Majestic might be deserting it…

What will happen to influencer marketing if Instagram ‘Likes’ go away?

In April, app researcher Jane Manchun Wong discovered Instagram was testing removing “Like” counts on posts. At the time, an Instagram spokesperson told TechCrunch it was not a public test, but an internal prototype and that the company was “exploring” new ways to reduce pressure on Instagram.The possibility that Instagram – a primary platform for influencer marketing – may potentially eliminate “Likes” could impact the influencer community, causing brands to question whether or not an influencer has enough sway to contribute to the brand’s marketing efforts. Without an outward facing metric such as “Likes,” influencers would have to rely on other resources to prove their content is worthwhile – once such resource: influencer marketing agencies.Good news for agencies“I do see it as a good thing for influencer marketing agencies and platform providers,” said Leah Logan, VP of media product strategy and marketing for Collective Bias.Logan’s influencer marketing agency works with a numbe…